Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT)-based detectors exhibit higher diagnostic sensitivity in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) than conventional Anger-MPI for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD); however, reduced specificity and diagnostic accuracy of CZT-MPI were observed. This study aims to compare these different camera systems and to examine the degree of inter-rater reproducibility among readers with varying experience in MPI. METHODS: 83 patients who underwent double stress/rest examinations using both a CZT and conventional SPECT cameras within one visit were included. Anonymized and randomized MPI-images were distributed to 15 international readers using a standardized questionnaire. Subsequent coronary angiography findings of ten patients served as a reference for analysis of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Image quality was significantly better in CZT-MPI with significantly lower breast attenuation (P < 0.05). CZT-MPI exhibited higher sensitivity than Anger-MPI (87.5% vs. 62.5%) and significantly reduced specificity (40% vs. 100%). Readers experienced with both camera systems had the highest inter-rater agreement indicating higher reproducibility (CZT 0.54 vs. conv. 0.49, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Higher diagnostic sensitivity of CZT-MPI offers advantages in detection of CAD yet potentially of at the cost of reduced specificity, therefore it requires special training and a differentiated evaluation approach, especially for non-experienced readers with such camera systems.