Abstract
BACKGROUND: We compared quantification of MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) with a 99mTc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT to (15)O-water PET. METHODS: SPECT MBF for thirty patients in the WATERDAY study was re-analyzed by QPET software with motion correction and optimal placement of the arterial input function. (15)O-water PET MBF was re-quantified using dedicated software. Inter-operator variability was assessed using repeatability coefficients (RPC). RESULTS: Significant correlations were observed between global (r = 0.91, P < 0.001) and regional MBF (r = 0.86, P < 0.001) with SPECT compared to PET. Global MBF (rest 0.95 vs 1.05 ml/min/g, P = 0.07; stress 2.62 vs 2.68 mL/min/g, P = 0.17) and MFR (2.65 vs 2.75, P = 0.86) were similar between SPECT and PET. Rest (0.81 vs 0.98 mL/min/g, P = 0.03) and stress MBF (1.98 vs 2.61 mL/min/g, P = 0.01) in right coronary artery (RCA) were lower with SPECT compared to PET. However, MFR in the RCA territory was similar (2.54 vs 2.77, P = 0.21). The SPECT-PET RPC for global MBFs and MFR were 0.95 mL/min/g and 0.94, with inter-observer RPC of 0.59 mL/min/g and 0.74, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MBF and MFR derived from CZT-SPECT with motion correction and optimal placement of the arterial input function showed good agreement with (15)O-water PET, as well as low inter-operator variability.