Abstract
The impact of knowledge of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status on patient decisions in high-risk triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) weighing benefit and toxicity is unknown. Here, 286 women with a history of non-metastatic breast cancer who had received chemotherapy completed a survey mimicking scenarios of residual TNBC after chemotherapy and unknown, negative, or positive ctDNA status to determine the shift in the decision to receive adjuvant therapy. Participants were then presented scenarios mimicking possible post-neoadjuvant therapies and rated acceptability. A general linear model with repeated measures determined contributions of risk reduction and toxicity. When the hypothetical risk of recurrence mimicked ctDNA negativity, significantly less participants were accepting of adjuvant capecitabine versus no therapy. When presented with ctDNA positivity and increased recurrence risk, the degree of benefit impacted acceptability more than the toxicity profile. As genomic technology advances and ctDNA assays become commercially available, it is imperative to understand the impact on patient decision-making.