Abstract
General anesthesia (GA) is typically recommended for category 1 emergency cesarean delivery (CD). For categories 2-4 emergencies, either regional or GA can be used. The factors influencing the choice of anesthetic technique in these categories remain poorly understood. We analyzed the association between the type of labor analgesia and subsequent anesthetic techniques employed for intrapartum categories 2 and 3 CD. In a prospective longitudinal cohort study, 300 women were consequently enrolled and categorized according to Lucas's classification of CD urgency. The techniques of anesthesia (GA, spinal, and epidural anesthesia [EA]) employed for CD were analyzed with respect to labor analgesia methods (remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia [remifentanil-PCA], EA, and nitrous oxide [N2O]). EA was the most frequent analgesic option (43.8%), followed by remifentanil-PCA (20.7%) and N2O (5.1%), while 30.4% of parturient women received no analgesia. All anesthetic methods showed a significant relationship with analgesic modalities (P < 0.001). Remifentanil-PCA was associated with a higher incidence of GA. Contraindication to EA was the primary factor related to the transition from remifentanil-PCA to GA. Most parturients who received EA were successfully converted to EA. Spinal anesthesia was the most common technique in women using N2O and those without labor analgesia. GA was associated with lower 5-min Apgar scores. The method of labor analgesia was associated with the anesthesia technique employed for categories 2 and 3 CD. This finding may guide patient counseling and intrapartum anesthetic planning. However, the analysis should be cautiously interpreted as the selection of anesthesia is a complex decision influenced by several clinical considerations.