Urban-rural differences in pneumonia risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide register-based study

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺炎风险的城乡差异:一项基于全国登记数据的研究

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urban-rural differences in treatment within chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been documented in Denmark, and we aim to investigate such differences in the risk of pneumonia. METHODS: A Danish register-based cross-sectional study including patients with an International Classification of Diseases 10(th) revision (ICD-10) diagnosis code of COPD (J.44) alive on the 31st of December 2018 (99,057 patients). Patients were grouped by municipality type on an urban-rural gradient (capital, metropolitan, provincial, commuter, rural). We identified outpatient pneumonias (redeemed prescriptions of antibiotics typically used for pneumonia) and pneumonia hospitalizations (ICD-10 codes) during 2018. Three groups were defined: 1) No pneumonia, 2) at least one outpatient pneumonia (but no pneumonia hospitalization), and 3) at least one pneumonia hospitalization. A multivariable multinomial logistic regression model was performed with municipality type as main explanatory variable. The 'No pneumonia' group was used as reference outcome group. RESULTS: Patients outside capital municipalities had significantly increased risk of experiencing outpatient pneumonia (Metropolitan: Odds ratio (OR) = 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-1.39. Provincial: OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.21-1.31. Commuter: OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.20-1.31. Rural: OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.23-1.33). No significant differences were found for pneumonia hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients in capital municipalities, patients with a hospital-registered COPD diagnosis in non-capital municipalities had a higher risk of annually redeeming at least one prescription for antibiotics typically used for outpatient pneumonia. We were unable to detect differences in pneumonia hospitalization between municipality types. Our study was not designed to assess causality, and we stress the need for future research to provide actionable insights for health policy makers.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。