Efficacy of different cavity liners compared to no cavity lining in managing deep caries in vital permanent teeth - a systematic review

不同窝洞衬垫与不使用窝洞衬垫治疗活髓恒牙深龋的疗效比较——一项系统评价

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to evaluate whether the use of a certain cavity lining material (I) in patients with deep caries lesions in mature or immature permanent teeth associated with no symptoms or reversible pulpitis (P) is as efficacious as other materials or no cavity lining (C) in terms of patient-reported and clinically-reported outcomes (O), with "failure" identified as the primary critical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. The systematic literature search was restricted to English-language publications using Cochrane Review, PubMed (Medline) and Ovid databases. Search strategies included combinations of free keywords, controlled vocabulary terms (Medical Subject Headings-MeSH), Boolean operators, truncations and proximity operators. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and comparative clinical trials (CCTs). Due to variability in reported outcomes, a meta-analysis was not conducted. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: Analysis of 12 studies showed no significant differences in clinical outcomes between restorations with and without cavity liners. Studies directly comparing restorations with and without liners showed no statistically significant differences in key outcomes such as failure rates, postoperative hypersensitivity or secondary caries. (GRADE: low certainty) and minimizing postoperative hypersensitivity (GRADE: very low certainty). The effect of cavity lining on tooth survival (success rate: 94%-100%) and restoration longevity (failure rate: 0%-6%) was of low certainty. CONCLUSION: Cavity liners, regardless of the material, do not consistently deliver superior clinical outcomes compared to no liners. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this systematic review suggest that routine use of cavity liners in deep caries management may not be necessary for achieving successful restorative outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。