Abstract
Climate change is intensifying droughts across the globe, challenging species to adapt to novel conditions. While plant physiological and phenological responses to drought are well-documented, less is known about how water scarcity affects the evolution of selfing across species ranges. According to the selfing syndrome hypothesis, in environments where selfing confers a fitness advantage, selection should favour floral traits associated with increased selfing relative to outcrossing. We used a field experiment near the northern range edge of the scarlet monkeyflower (Mimulus cardinalis) to test this hypothesis both spatially (among leading-edge, central, and trailing-edge populations), and temporally (between cohorts separated by a period of historic drought). Although populations from different range positions showed genetic differentiation in some floral traits, these differences did not consistently support predictions of the selfing syndrome hypothesis. Contrary to the predictions of reduced investment in floral rewards and increased selfing ability at range edges, the sugar content of nectar was greater and autogamous seed set was smaller in leading-edge than central populations, herkogamy tended to be greater in trailing-edge populations relative to leading-edge and central ones, and nectar volume did not vary predictably among regions. There was no support for the evolution of selfing syndrome from the predrought ancestors to the postdrought descendants. Instead, in leading-edge populations, descendants evolved greater sugar content relative to ancestors, and there were no other differences between ancestors and descendants in any other trait or region. Overall, these findings suggest that mating system evolution in M. cardinalis likely reflects a complex interplay of regional factors including range position, historical adaptation, and local environmental variability, rather than simple stress-induced shifts towards selfing.