Abstract
Quantification of serum lipoproteins provides information relative to the overall metabolic health, degree of lipid mobilization, and hepatic function of dairy cattle. Automated assays performed on benchtop chemistry analyzers and commercially available kits use reagents developed for human lipoproteins. The substantial physical and chemical differences between bovine and human lipoproteins potentially confounds the use of these assays in evaluating bovine lipoproteins. In this study, we prospectively analyzed serum lipoproteins from 56 Holstein cows using horizontal slab agarose gel electrophoresis to semi-quantify the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) fractions by optical densitometry. Ultracentrifugation was used to confirm the electrophoretic separation pattern of the lipoproteins. The values obtained using the electrophoretic method were compared with values obtained by direct measure of HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglyceride (TG) concentrations on a Roche chemistry analyzer, and calculated LDL cholesterol. Correlation between these methods was poor for HDL (Passing-Bablok regression line: y = 30.31 + 0.853x) and could not be calculated for LDL. Automated HDL values were equal to, or higher than, the total cholesterol concentration in 25 of the 56 samples. The TG concentrations were above the reference interval in 18 samples, and these samples had an average of 96% of the cholesterol measured as HDL by the automated method, and 78% HDL by electrophoresis. Given that it is physiologically impossible to have more cholesterol within the HDL fraction than in the total serum fraction, and the increased proportion of TG found in LDL and very-low-density lipoprotein, our results draw into question the accuracy of the Roche automated assay in quantifying bovine lipoprotein fractions.