Abstract
California wildfires have grown increasingly frequent and intense over recent decades, raising serious public health concerns. In response, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) 2022 Scoping Plan outlines land management strategies to reduce wildfire risk and associated emissions under various climate change scenarios. This study evaluates the health benefits of CARB's official mitigation pathway, the S3 scenario, compared to a business-as-usual approach, using three global climate models (GCMs) and three future time slices. We apply the GEOS-Chem model to estimate fire-induced PM(2.5) concentrations and use the U.S. EPA's BenMAP-CE tool, along with a wildfire-specific chronic mortality dose-response function, to assess associated morbidity and mortality. Results suggest that S3 can significantly reduce fire-related PM(2.5) exposure, particularly in northern and central California where concentrations are typically highest-and where S3 treatments are most effective. In 2035 under the second generation Canadian Earth System Model GCM, for instance, S3 is associated with 1,927 fewer premature deaths and substantial reductions in asthma- and respiratory-related emergency room visits. However, health benefits vary by GCM and year, underscoring the influence of meteorological conditions on fire activity and health outcomes. These findings point to the importance of strategically timed and located land management actions and integrating climate variability into future mitigation planning.