Barriers to conducting prospective multicentre studies in paediatric orthopaedics in Europe: Insights from the EPOS Discoid Meniscus (DiMe) project

欧洲儿科骨科前瞻性多中心研究的障碍:来自 EPOS 盘状半月板 (DiMe) 项目的启示

阅读:3

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prospective multicentre studies represent a cornerstone of evidence-based advancement. However, within orthopaedics, and particularly in the European context of paediatric orthopaedics, such rigorous investigations are notably scarce. This study aims to explore the organizational, regulatory, and resource-related barriers hindering initiation of these crucial studies, using the setup phase of the 'EPOS Discoid Meniscus (DiMe) Project: a Prospective Multicentric Cohort Protocol'. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from 19 centres initially recruited for the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society DiMe Project (NCT05580315) cohort study. Delays and perceived obstacles encountered during initiation phases: contract negotiation, ethics committee approval, and patient enrolment were assessed. A descriptive analysis was performed to characterize the data. Twelve responding centres (63.2%) were still in the contract negotiation phase, while 36.8% (n = 7) had progressed to the patient enrolment stage. RESULTS: Median duration for contract negotiation was 12 months (Q1-Q3: 7-22), matching ethical approval (Q1-Q3: 3-12). Sixty-three point two percent (n = 12) of responding centres were still in the contract negotiation phase, while 36.8% (n = 7) had progressed to patient enrolment, with 41 patients enrolled across these sites. Formal ethics committee submission was required de novo in 84.2% (n = 16) of responding centres. Major challenges identified included bureaucratic delays, lack of institutional support, absence of dedicated research staff, and prolonged administrative processes. CONCLUSION: The initiation of European multicentre studies in paediatric orthopaedics is hindered by institutional and regulatory barriers. Streamlining administrative and ethical processes and allocation of resources and personnel are needed to improve efficiency and facilitate successful collaborations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V - Expert opinion / Cross-sectional survey.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。