Beta-lactam plus macrolide treatment versus beta-lactam monotherapy for community-acquired pneumonia: a propensity score analysis using data from a multicenter prospective cohort study

β-内酰胺类抗生素联合大环内酯类抗生素治疗与β-内酰胺类抗生素单药治疗社区获得性肺炎的倾向评分分析:一项基于多中心前瞻性队列研究的数据

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) substantially contributes to mortality and morbidity globally, with beta-lactams being a primary therapeutic agent. The efficacy of adding macrolides to beta-lactams in CAP treatment remains controversial. Here, we evaluated whether beta-lactam plus macrolide treatment (BLM) is more effective than beta-lactam monotherapy (BL) for preventing CAP mortality. METHODS: We performed a secondary data analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with CAP at four institutions. We selected patients treated with either BLM or BL. The primary endpoint was the outcome at the end of the observation period (death or recovery). The secondary endpoints were the length of hospital stay and duration of antibiotic use. Multiple imputations with bootstrapping were used to address missing data. Background characteristics were adjusted via propensity score matching. RESULTS: Of the 3,470 patients initially included in the study, 2,784 were analyzed; 306 received BLM and 2,478 received BL. The average observation period for the groups was 17.0 (± 18.4) and 24.0 days (± 24.6), respectively. After propensity score matching, mortality was similar between the groups (5.06% for BLM vs. 4.98% for BL; difference 0.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 3.73 to 3.71), as were recovery rates (91.79% for BLM vs. 91.69% for BL; difference 0.00, 95% CI − 4.48 to 4.82). In the subgroup analysis of patients with severe CAP, mortality was 12.00% for BLM vs. 13.33% for BL (difference 0.00, 95% CI − 20.00 to 16.13), and recovery rates were 82.86% vs. 83.33% (difference 0.00, 95% CI − 20.00 to 20.00). CONCLUSION: Similar outcomes were observed in the mortality and recovery rates between the BLM and BL groups among patients with CAP. Clinicians should thoughtfully weigh the benefits of BLM against the potential risks, including adverse effects and antimicrobial resistance, when managing patients with CAP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), identifier UMIN000006909, on December 19, 2011. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-025-12408-x.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。