TIVS versus Non-TIVS management of limb vascular injury in limb salvage: systematic review and meta-analysis

肢体挽救中肢体血管损伤的TIVS与非TIVS治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the postoperative complications between temporary intravascular shunts (TIVS) and non-TIVS management in limb salvage surgery for severe limb trauma, and to provide reference for clinical decision making. METHODS: The literature on postoperative complications of limb salvage with and without TIVS was searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and MEDLINE from January 2000 to December 2023. References were screened and extracted according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.4 software. RESULTS: 8 studies were included, including 1375 cases, 329 of which used TIVS and 1046 of which did not. Compared with no TIVS group, TIVS group was associated with a lower rate of amputation (OR = 0.48, 95%CI: [0.29, 0.82], P = 0.007) and less limb ischemic time (SMD = -0.96, 95%CI: [-1.17, -0.74], P < 0.00001), the incidence of thrombosis (OR = 1.48, 95%CI: [0.46, 4.78], P = 0.51), fasciotomy (OR = 0.84, 95%CI: [0.30, 2.36], P = 0.75) and infection (OR = 0.88, 95%CI: [0.35, 2.19], P = 0.78) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Compared with no TIVS group, TIVS group may reduce amputation rate and limb ischemia time, prospective multi-centre studies are needed for further evaluation.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。