Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled hyperphosphatemia in end stage renal disease (ESRD) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), bone disorders, and premature mortality. Randomized controlled trials show reduced CVD risk of non-calcium-based phosphate-binders (NCBPBs) compared to CBPBs although evidence from real world data is less consistent. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of NCBPBs, CBPBs, to no phosphate-binder (PB) on mortality and cardiovascular disease in Thai hyperphosphatemic ESRDs. METHODS: A retrospective-cohort was conducted by using data from 2 university hospitals between January 2010 and July 2020 (COA. MURA2020/1398 and IRB No.100/63). Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and CVD-free time. Secondary outcomes included bone disorders following ESRD. An inverse-probability weighting with regression adjustment was used to assess treatment effects. RESULTS: A total of 8,005 patients were included. Initial CBPBs were associated with both longer OS and CVD-free time compared to no-PBs, while initial treatment with aluminum hydroxide was the highest risk of bone disorders. Patients who received CBPBs-NCBPBs had longest OS, followed by aluminum hydroxide, and CBPBs, with average OS of 13.5, 11.0, and 10.9 years, respectively. The average CVD-free time was longest for the CBPBs-NCBPBs, followed by CBPBs-CBPBs compared to no-PBs. However, these comparisons were insignificantly different. CONCLUSIONS: initial hyperphosphatemic ESRD treatment with CBPBs provided longer OS and CVD-free time compared to no-PBs, while aluminum hydroxide was the highest risk of bone disorders. CBPBs followed by NCBPBs achieved the longest OS and CVD-free time, although these were statistical non-significance.