Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emergency laparotomy (EL) carries high morbidity and mortality relative to elective abdominal surgery. While Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) principles improve outcomes in elective care, their translation to emergencies is inconsistent. The emergency department (ED) provides a window for rapid risk stratification and pre-optimization, provided that interventions do not delay definitive surgery. METHODS: We conducted a PRISMA-ScR-conformant scoping review to map ED-initiated, ERAS-aligned strategies for EL. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched in February 2025. Eligible sources comprised ERAS guidelines, systematic reviews, cohort studies, consensus statements, and programmatic reports. Evidence was charted across five a priori domains: (i) ERAS standards, (ii) comparative effectiveness, (iii) ED-feasible pre-optimization, (iv) risk stratification (Emergency Surgery Score [ESS], frailty, sarcopenia), and (v) oncological emergencies. RESULTS: Thirty-four sources met inclusion. ERAS guidelines codify rapid assessment, multimodal intraoperative care, and early postoperative rehabilitation under a strict no-delay rule. Meta-analysis and cohort data suggest ERAS-aligned pathways reduce complications and length of stay, though heterogeneity persists. ED-feasible measures include multimodal analgesia, goal-directed fluids, early safe nutrition, respiratory preparation, and anemia/micronutrient optimization (IV iron, vitamin B12, folate, vitamin D). Sarcopenia, frailty, and ESS consistently predicted adverse outcomes, supporting targeted bundle activation. Evidence from oncological emergencies indicates feasibility under no-delay governance. CONCLUSIONS: A minimal, ED-initiated, ERAS-aligned bundle is feasible, guideline-concordant, and may shorten hospitalization and reduce complications in EL. We propose a practical framework that links rapid risk stratification, opportunistic pre-optimization, and explicit continuity into intra- and postoperative care; future studies should test fidelity, costs, and outcome impact in pragmatic emergency pathways.