Policy practice for narrowing urban-rural healthcare gaps: determinants and implementation path of the urban doctors servicing rural areas policy in Beijing, China

缩小城乡医疗卫生差距的政策实践:北京市“城市医生服务农村”政策的决定因素及实施路径

阅读:4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The urban-rural disparities in healthcare resources and service quality remain a critical challenge for equitable public health development in China. To address this, Beijing has implemented the "Urban Doctors Serving Rural Areas (UDSR)" policy-a key counterpart support initiative. Its core goal is to bridge urban-rural healthcare gaps by mobilizing urban medical professionals to serve rural institutions. METHODS: Grounded in Van Meter and Van Horn's policy implementation framework, this study employs fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). It examines 39 annual observations from 13 paired urban-rural hospitals in Beijing over 2017-2019. To capture temporal changes, the study applies time-series QCA techniques. It analyzes conditions including support project quantity, subsidy source diversification, prescription rights, professional matching, communication channels, and policy cognition, with rural medical technology improvement as the outcome variable. RESULTS: Three critical determinants of UDSR policy effectiveness are identified: the number of support projects, diversified subsidy sources, and prescription rights for urban doctors in rural institutions. Four implementation pathways are uncovered: (1) goal-and-cognition-driven, (2) professional-matching-driven, (3) external-funding-driven, and (4) comprehensive-factor-driven. Temporal analysis reveals two evolutionary paths: a dominant path achieved via integrating multiple factors, and a transitional path shifting from external funding reliance to professional alignment and goal cognition-reflecting adaptive maturation of the UDSR policy. CONCLUSION: This study advances understanding of counterpart support policy implementation by revealing synergistic combinations of influencing factors and dynamic evolutionary paths. The findings make two key contributions. Theoretically, they provide insights for policy implementation research in non-western contexts; practically, they offer guidance for optimizing urban-rural healthcare resource allocation and provide a framework for refining targeted support mechanisms in China and similar developing countries.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。