Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute and subacute central nervous system (CNS) infections represent critical medical emergencies requiring prompt and accurate management. The practices in managing such cases at various primary or secondary health-care facilities, where patients usually have first contact and receive preliminary treatment, can have impact on diagnosis and outcomes. The present study aimed to investigate the differences in microbiological confirmation rates and outcomes between referred and non-referred cases of community-acquired CNS infections at a tertiary centre, while identifying gaps in the management practices at first-contact healthcare facilities. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Jodhpur. All referred and non-referred cases with suspected CNS infections underwent microbiological evaluation and all efforts were made for etiological identification by utilising specimens from CNS- sites like cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and lesion biopsies or extra-CNS sites like blood cultures, serology, tissue biopsies and respiratory samples. The management practices at centres that referred the cases were also evaluated. The rate of microbiological confirmation and outcomes in terms of mortality and disability by using 30th day Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) and duration of hospital stay were determined and compared between referred and non-referred group. RESULTS: In this study out 88 cases with acute or subacute CNS infections, 50 were referred, and 38 were non-referred who presented directly. Non-referred cases had better microbiological confirmations (92.1% vs. 28%, p < 0.0001) and outcomes (GOS 4 or 5, 71% vs. 48%, p = 0.031) as compared to referred cases. The length of stay was also less in non-referred cases by an average of 8 days. CONCLUSION: Earlier suspicion, appropriate sample collection and processing and prompt treatment improves outcome in cases with acute/subacute CNS infections. Better infrastructures and training are warranted at preliminary levels of health care, which usually are the first contact centre for such infections.