Diagnosis of Monkeypox infection: Validation of two diagnostic kits for viral detection using RT-PCR

猴痘感染的诊断:两种病毒检测诊断试剂盒的RT-PCR验证

阅读:1

Abstract

Monkeypox virus, a zoonotic Orthopox DNA virus was rarely reported outside of African regions until April 2022. Since then, thousands of cases have been reported worldwide. In order to cope with the increasing need for laboratory diagnosis, the availability of reliable commercial PCR assays is of paramount importance. In this study we compared the diagnostic performance of two commercial real-time (RT)-PCR assays, the Novaplex™ MPXV Assay and the Bio-Speedy® Monkeypox Virus qPCR Kit, for the detection of Monkeypox virus (MPXV) DNA from 154 human samples. These assays were compared to a recently published in-house assay that included a general MPXV target (G2T) and a West African specific target (genericWA). All assays demonstrated 100% specificity. While sensitivity of the Novpalex assay was 100% the sensitivity of the other assays was lower; 94% for the Bio-speedy assay and G2R assay and 88% for the genericWA assay. The sensitivity differences between the methods manifested almost entirely in those pharyngeal samples in which the Ct values were high (≥35). The Novaplex™ MPXV Assay showed higher Ct values compared with the other methods with a median of 27.1 compared with the Bio-Speedy assay (median 15.8, p < 0.001), the G2R assay (median 23.5, p < 0.001) and the genericWA assay (median 23.6, p < 0.001). For all 4 methods, the Ct values were higher in samples taken from oropharynx compared with samples from rectal and pustule swabs.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。