Abstract
Water irrigation is an efficacious decontaminating method for dermis exposures to corrosive agents and hence has been widely applied to treat especially alkali burns. Nevertheless, once alkali has infiltrated the deep subcutaneous tissue, washing the tissue surface with water irrigation does not attenuate the damage progress. Therefore, significant efforts have been devoted to promising strategies aimed at removing the deeply infiltrated lye. According to a recent report, the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) reduces the pH value of the exudate from alkali-provoked burns thus accelerating wound healing. However, it remains to be ascertained whether or not NPWT coupled with water irrigation, that is, iNPWT, more effectively hinders the alkali injury deepening. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of an early application of water irrigation with or without NPWT in preventing the progressive deepening of the alkali burn in an animal model. Our histological examination results showed no appreciable difference in tissue injury depth, dermal retention, inflammatory cell infiltration, re-epithelization, and cellular function between iNPWT and water irrigation alone treatments. Thus, our results prove that the more expensive NPWT coupled with water irrigation does not more effectively hinder the alkali's injury deepening. Hence, iNPWT use should be more cautious in clinical practice.