Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Anti-NMDA receptor autoimmune encephalitis (NMDARE) is a common pediatric encephalitis, resulting in neuropsychiatric symptoms. Predicting severity and course is challenging, with objective cognitive assessments lacking in NMDARE, especially in children. The CASE (Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis) measures severity in autoimmune encephalitis. The CALS (Cognitive and Linguistic Scale) assesses cognitive-linguistic recovery in children with acquired brain injury. This study examines severity and cognitive status in pediatric NMDARE by comparing objectives measures: modified Rankin score (mRS), CASE, and CALS. METHODS: Twenty-one patients were identified via retrospective chart review with a confirmed NMDARE diagnosis (ages of 3-18 years) who required inpatient rehabilitation. The mRS, CASE, and CALS were assessed at admission and discharge. RESULTS: Scores demonstrated improvement from admission to discharge, with variability in individual recovery trajectories. CALS identified three clusters of patients with differential rates of early recovery. CALS <30 was associated with minimal improvement and poor outcomes. CALS ≥30 had a likelihood ratio score of 12.0 to predict improvement. CASE and CALS were moderately correlated, but neither correlated with mRS. DISCUSSION: CALS and CASE appear to be complementary measures for assessing severity and cognitive status in pediatric NMDARE, including those with low responsiveness, with implications for treatment and outcomes.