Abstract
BACKGROUND: Differentiation of leukocytes is one of the key diagnostic procedures in clinical medicine, and correct identification of them in a blood smear is of essential importance. Light microscopy is the reference method for leukocyte differentiation; however, it is time-consuming and must be performed by a highly qualified specialist. For this reason, automatic analysers capable of precise and accurate differentiation of blood cells in the examined sample are increasingly present in haematology laboratories. This paper aims to evaluate the performance of the Sysmex XN-3100 analyser, manufactured by SYSMEX CORPORATION, Kobe, Japan., with a focus on the advantages and disadvantages of its digital microscopy in the differentiation of leukocytes and give brief guidelines on the possibilities and limitations of everyday work on the basis of the obtained results. METHODS: Digital optical microscopy on 253 samples was performed with primary data (preclassification) collected after the completion of the autoanalysis. Before validating the obtained results, the data were reviewed by a medical biochemistry specialist who confirmed or corrected them. This generated secondary data (reclassification). The two groups of data were statistically analysed using Passing-Bablok regression analysis, Bland-Altman analysis and Spearman correlation. RESULTS: The obtained results showed strong correlations between the primary and secondary analysis in all cells (highest in lymphocyte group (r=0.986), lowest in eosinophil group (r=0.870)) except immature granulocytes and blasts (significant deviation from linearity, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The haematology analyser Sysmex XN-3100 shows high performance in leukocyte analysis and differentiation using digital microscopy, but samples containing blasts and immature granulocytes must additionally be analysed by light microscopy.