Individualized decitabine dosing for post-HSCT maintenance in MDS and secondary AML from MDS: long-term outcomes from the PODAC trial and matched controls

针对MDS和MDS继发性AML患者,采用个体化地西他滨剂量进行HSCT后维持治疗:PODAC试验及匹配对照组的长期疗效

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains a major clinical challenge in higher-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Although hypomethylating agents have been evaluated as posttransplant maintenance therapy, their efficacy remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of individualized decitabine maintenance therapy following HSCT in patients with MDS or secondary acute myeloid leukemia from MDS. DESIGN: This was a retrospective comparative study based on a long-term follow-up of the phase I PODAC trial, which individualized posttransplant decitabine maintenance dosing. METHODS: Nineteen PODAC participants were included in the treatment group and compared with 52 matched control patients selected through target trial emulation using identical eligibility criteria. RESULTS: For the 19 PODAC participants, a median of 6 cycles was administered, starting at 5 mg/m(2)/day and escalating to a median maintenance dose of 7 mg/m(2)/day. After a median follow-up of 11.4 years in the PODAC group and 9.7 years in the control group (p = 0.90), no significant differences were observed between the two groups in overall survival, relapse-free survival, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free relapse-free survival, or the incidence of relapse, nonrelapse mortality, and grades II-IV acute GVHD. However, the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD was significantly lower in the PODAC group and decitabine maintenance emerged as an independent predictor for longer chronic GVHD-free relapse-free survival (cCRFS). CONCLUSION: Decitabine maintenance using an adaptive dosing approach enabled prolonged treatment and was associated with a lower incidence of chronic GVHD and improved cGRFS. However, it did not improve survival or relapse outcomes compared to the control group.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。