Prescribing Patterns and Treatment Persistence for Overactive Bladder in Japan Across Medical Specialties and Facility Types: A Nationwide Claims Database Study

日本不同医疗专科和医疗机构类型中膀胱过度活动症的处方模式和治疗持续性:一项全国性索赔数据库研究

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe real-world initial pharmacotherapy, treatment persistence, and diagnostic testing for overactive bladder in Japan by medical specialty and facility type. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study used nationwide administrative claims data. Patients aged 15 years or older diagnosed with overactive bladder in 2022 who newly initiated pharmacotherapy were followed for 1 year. Analyses were conducted across four groups defined by medical specialty and facility type. We summarized initial medication, baseline comorbidities, one-year treatment persistence, and performance of urinalysis and postvoid residual volume measurement at diagnosis and within 1-3 months thereafter. RESULTS: Of 702 078 patients diagnosed with overactive bladder, 65 173 met the eligibility criteria (median age 80 years; interquartile range 74.0-85.0; women 56.3%). β3-adrenoceptor agonists accounted for more than 70% of initial prescriptions in both urology and internal medicine, whereas anticholinergics were used more often in internal medicine than in urology. Baseline comorbidities, including dementia, were broadly similar between patients initiating β3-adrenoceptor agonists and those initiating anticholinergics, except for benign prostatic hyperplasia. At 1 year, persistence was higher for β3-adrenoceptor agonists than for anticholinergics and other drugs, but remained below 30% for β3-adrenoceptor agonists. Urinalysis and postvoid residual volume measurement were performed more frequently in urology than in internal medicine. CONCLUSIONS: β3-adrenoceptor agonists predominated as initial pharmacotherapy for overactive bladder in Japan, whereas anticholinergics were used more often in internal medicine than in urology. Similar comorbidity profiles and specialty-related differences in diagnostic testing highlight opportunities to optimize individualized prescribing and strengthen guideline-concordant evaluation across care settings.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。