Inhaled nitric oxide for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

吸入一氧化氮治疗成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is used as a rescue therapy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), its impact on patient-centered outcomes remains uncertain. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to test the hypothesis that the addition of iNO to standard care improves survival in adult patients with ARDS. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP for RCTs evaluating iNO in adult patients with ARDS through October 28, 2025. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI), receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT), duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit stay, length of hospital stay, receipt of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), mean pulmonary artery pressure, partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspiratory oxygen (PaO(2)/FiO(2)) ratio, elevated methemoglobin concentrations (> 5%), elevated nitrogen dioxide concentrations (> 3 ppm), extubation, and reintubation. We pooled data using a random-effects model, assessed the risk of bias with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and graded certainty with the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We included 11 RCTs comprising 1302 patients. Only one study was of low risk of bias. iNO therapy may result in no difference in mortality at the longest follow-up (relative risk [RR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.23; I(2) = 0%; low certainty). iNO may improve PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio slightly (mean difference, 15.03 mmHg; 95% CI, 6.19-23.86; I(2) = 0%; low certainty). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect on ECMO use (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.10-2.17; I(2) = 45%; very low certainty). iNO may increase the need for RRT (RR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.17-2.08; I(2) = 0%; low certainty). No clear differences were observed in other secondary outcomes. No study reported data on reintubation. CONCLUSIONS: Although iNO may improve oxygenation slightly, it may not confer survival or other patient-centered benefits and may increase the need for RRT. High-quality randomized evidence is needed to guide the optimal patient selection for this therapeutic option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024573383).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。