The Comparison of Efficacy of Bilateral Type I Versus Type II Pectoral Nerve Block Applied with Ultrasound-Guided for Postoperative Analgesia in Gynecomastia Surgeries

超声引导下双侧I型与II型胸神经阻滞在男性乳房发育症手术后镇痛中的疗效比较

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gynecomastia surgeries are frequently performed due to esthetic concerns. There is lack of data regarding postoperative pain control for these patients. The aim of this study was to compare the pectoral nerve (PECS) block type I and type II with respect to postoperative analgesic consumption, pain scores in these patients. METHODS: The prospective randomized study was conducted with 30 patients, with American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II, between the ages of 18 and 50, and undergoing bilateral gynecomastia surgery. The patients were divided into two groups: PECS I block with general anesthesia (n = 15) and PECS II block with general anesthesia (n = 15). The demographic data, hemodynamic parameters, postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) scores (at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 h postoperative), the number of patients who needed rescue analgesia, and block-related adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: NRS scores at 30 min, 1 and 2 h postoperatively were similar in the two groups, whereas the scores at 6, 12 and 24 h were significantly lower in the PECS II group (p = 0.005, p = 0.007, p = 0.002, respectively). It was determined that the postoperative 24-h tramadol consumption was statistically significantly lower in the PECS II group (p = 0.005). Additional analgesic was required in two patients in the PECS I group, but none in the PECS II group. CONCLUSION: PECS blocks could effectively reduce postoperative pain level in gynecomastia operations; however, PECS II block was superior to PECS I block in terms of both analgesic consumption and pain scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。