Unveiling the gap: technical-tactical performance differences between main and qualifying draws in professional padel

揭示差距:职业板式网球正赛和资格赛的技术战术表现差异

阅读:1

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate technical-tactical differences between main draw vs. qualifying draw matches in male and female professional padel players. Through systematic observation, data were collected from 39 matches (4,585 points) of the professional male qualifying draw (n = 9) and main draw (n = 13), and female qualifying draw (n = 8) and main draw (n = 9) during the 2023 World Padel Tour Finland Padel Open tournament. Using chi-square analysis and corrected standardized residuals (CSR), the results showed significant differences between draws for final shot relative to the side of the play, serving efficiency and the type of final shot. Left side male players made more forced errors (CSR = 2.8) and fewer unforced errors (CSR = 3.2) in main draw compared to qualifying draw matches. While players were in the return game, both male and female players made a higher proportion of forced errors (CSR = 3.3; CSR = 2.7) and a lower proportion of unforced errors (CSR = 3.3; CSR = 2.3) in main draw compared to qualifying draw matches. Specific shot-type analysis revealed that male and female players made varying numbers of winners, forced errors and unforced errors with certain types of shots in the main vs. qualifying draw matches. These findings provide valuable insights for players and coaches to optimize their technical-tactical strategies based on the competition draw and match context.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。