Abstract
PURPOSE: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated a treatment effect of endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke with large infarct, commonly defined as an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 3-5. However, data on endovascular thrombectomy in patients with very low ASPECTS of 0-2 remain scarce. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing endovascular thrombectomy versus medical treatment alone in acute ischemic anterior circulation stroke with very large infarct, defined as ASPECTS of 0-2. The primary outcome was the shift toward better functional outcomes on the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Random effects meta-analysis was performed using the generic inverse variance method. RESULTS: Literature research identified four RCTs which evaluated the treatment effect of endovascular thrombectomy for large infarcts and provided a subgroup analysis of the mRS shift in patients with ASPECTS of 0-2. The pooled analysis showed a significant shift toward better 90-day mRS scores in favor of endovascular thrombectomy (pooled odds ratio, 1.62, 95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.04, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests a treatment effect of endovascular thrombectomy in specific patients with very low ASPECTS of 0-2, challenging the use of ASPECTS for treatment selection in acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. An individual patient meta-analysis of RCTs would strengthen evidence in the treatment of patients with ASPECTS of 0-2.