Identification of key risk factors for venous thromboembolism in urological inpatients based on the Caprini scale and interpretable machine learning methods

基于Caprini评分和可解释的机器学习方法,识别泌尿外科住院患者静脉血栓栓塞的关键危险因素

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the key risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in urological inpatients based on the Caprini scale using an interpretable machine learning method. METHODS: VTE risk data of urological inpatients were obtained based on the Caprini scale in the case hospital. Based on the data, the Boruta method was used to further select the key variables from the 37 variables in the Caprini scale. Furthermore, decision rules corresponding to each risk level were generated using the rough set (RS) method. Finally, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and backpropagation artificial neural network (BPANN) were used to verify the data accuracy and were compared with the RS method. RESULTS: Following the screening, the key risk factors for VTE in urology were "(C(1)) Age," "(C(2)) Minor Surgery planned," "(C(3)) Obesity (BMI > 25)," "(C(8)) Varicose veins," "(C(9)) Sepsis (< 1 month)," (C(10)) "Serious lung disease incl. pneumonia (< 1month) " (C(11)) COPD," "(C(16)) Other risk," "(C(18)) Major surgery (> 45 min)," "(C(19)) Laparoscopic surgery (> 45 min)," "(C(20)) Patient confined to bed (> 72 h)," "(C18) Malignancy (present or previous)," "(C(23)) Central venous access," "(C(31)) History of DVT/PE," "(C(32)) Other congenital or acquired thrombophilia," and "(C(34)) Stroke (< 1 month." According to the decision rules of different risk levels obtained using the RS method, "(C(1)) Age," "(C(18)) Major surgery (> 45 minutes)," and "(C(21)) Malignancy (present or previous)" were the main factors influencing mid- and high-risk levels, and some suggestions on VTE prevention were indicated based on these three factors. The average accuracies of the RS, RF, SVM, and BPANN models were 79.5%, 87.9%, 92.6%, and 97.2%, respectively. In addition, BPANN had the highest accuracy, recall, F1-score, and precision. CONCLUSIONS: The RS model achieved poorer accuracy than the other three common machine learning models. However, the RS model provides strong interpretability and allows for the identification of high-risk factors and decision rules influencing high-risk assessments of VTE in urology. This transparency is very important for clinicians in the risk assessment process.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。