Lack of impact of baseline QRS morphology on the right heart during long-term left bundle branch pacing in patients with atrioventricular block

在房室传导阻滞患者中,长期左束支起搏期间基线QRS波形对右心无影响

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insights into right ventricle (RV) activation during left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) have postulated direct transseptal and retrograde physiological pathways, which may be absent in patients with infranodal conduction abnormalities. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the long-term impact of LBBP on the right heart in patients with atrioventricular block (AVB) according to the baseline QRS morphology. METHODS: Overall, 82 patients with successful LBBP for AVB were prospectively evaluated for changes in right atrial volume (RAV), RV diameter, tricuspid annulus peak systolic elevation (TAPSE), RV S' wave, and tricuspid regurgitation (TR). RESULTS: A total of 41.5% had a baseline narrow QRS, 29.3% had right bundle branch block (RBBB), and 29.3% had left bundle branch block (LBBB). RV activation time was similar between the 3 groups. The patients were followed over a mean period of 715.7 ± 194.8 days. In the narrow QRS group, there were no changes between the follow-up and the baseline values for RA volumes, RV diameter, RVS'W, and TR, with a significant improvement in the TAPSE. In the LBBB group, there were no differences in RA volumes, RV diameter, RVS'W, and TAPSE at follow-up, but TR worsened from 0.7 ± 0.7 to 1 ± 0.9 (P = .04). Same changes were seen in the RBBB group, with an increase in TR from 0.6 ± 0.5 to 1 ± 0.7 (P = .02). There was no inter-group difference in the magnitude of change for each right heart echocardiographic parameter. CONCLUSION: LBBP showed a similar long-term protective effect on the right heart chambers' dimensions and function in patients with AVB, regardless of the baseline QRS morphology.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。