Evaluation of cardiac energetics in left bundle branch area pacing using noninvasive pressure-volume loops

利用无创压力-容积环评估左束支区域起搏时的心脏能量学

阅读:4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conduction system pacing, particularly left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), is emerging as the preferred strategy for bradyarrhythmias and cardiac resynchronization therapy because of its clinical benefits. However, the differences in the impact of LBBAP vs right ventricular pacing (RVP) on cardiac energetics remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of LBBAP and RVP on cardiac energetics using a novel noninvasive pressure-volume (PV) loop algorithm derived from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: We included patients who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation with LBBAP or RVP between January 2021 and October 2024, followed by CMR imaging. Noninvasive PV loops were calculated using volumes derived from CMR and a time-varying elastance model. The parameters obtained from the PV loop analysis were compared between the LBBAP and RVP groups. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (3-40 mm Hg) and excluding anodal pacing cases. RESULTS: Of the 235 patients, 15 were analyzed (LBBAP group, n = 7; RVP group, n = 8). The end-systolic PV relationship was significantly higher in the LBBAP group (2.25 mm Hg/mL [1.85-2.55]) compared to the RVP group (1.39 mm Hg/mL [1.33-1.69]; P <.0001). The potential energy and PV area were significantly lower in the LBBAP group (P = .0006 and P = .006, respectively), whereas the ventricular efficiency was significantly higher (63.1% vs 57.4%; P = .006). CONCLUSION: LBBAP reduces myocardial energy consumption and improves ventricular efficiency compared with RVP, suggesting its advantages in pacing-associated cardiac energetics.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。