Abstract
The current prognostic stratification of asymptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome is suboptimal. The so-called 'Brugada burden' concept is certainly emerging: the more extensive are the electrocardiographic alterations of the syndrome in space (peripheral as well as precordial derivations) and in time (persistence in the follow-up of electrocardiographic alterations), the greater the probability of arrhythmic events. Numerous clinical and electrocardiographic markers have been considered risk factors, but none of them alone is able to guide the choice of whether or not to implant a defibrillator, the only therapy so far proved effective in preventing SD (sudden death) in these patients. The prognostic value of the electrophysiology study also gradually decreased over time. Therapeutic decisions must therefore be taken, at the moment, considering a large number of variables, possibly included in risk scores to be validated prospectively and in large series. Magnetic resonance and the study of electro-anatomical alterations of the right ventricular outflow tract will most likely improve our prognostic stratification capacity in the future.