Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic

比较两种断裂韧性测试方法,分别使用玻璃浸渍牙科陶瓷和氧化锆牙科陶瓷。

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the fracture toughness (KIc) obtained from the single edge V-notched beam (SEVNB) and the fractographic analysis (FTA) of a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each material, ten bar-shaped specimens were prepared for the SEVNB method (3 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm) and the FTA method (2 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm). The starter V-notch was prepared as the fracture initiating flaw for the SEVNB method. A Vickers indentation load of 49 N was used to create a controlled surface flaw on each FTA specimen. All specimens were loaded to fracture using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5-1 mm/min. The independent-samples t-test was used for the statistical analysis of the KIc values at α=0.05. RESULTS: The mean KIc of zirconia ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (5.4 ± 1.6 MPa·m(1/2)) was comparable to that obtained from FTA method (6.3 ± 1.6 MPa·m(1/2)). The mean KIc of glass-infiltrated ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (4.1 ± 0.6 MPa·m(1/2)) was significantly lower than that obtained from FTA method (5.1 ± 0.7 MPa·m(1/2)). CONCLUSION: The mean KIc of the glass-infiltrated and zirconia ceramics obtained from the SEVNB method were lower than those obtained from FTA method even they were not significantly different for the zirconia material. The differences in the KIc values could be a result of the differences in the characteristics of fracture initiating flaws of these two methods.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。