Abstract
BACKGROUND: Functional resistance training is frequently applied to rehabilitate individuals with neuromusculoskeletal injuries. It is performed by applying resistance in conjunction with a task-specific training, such as walking. However, the benefits of this training may be limited by motor slacking, a phenomenon in which the human body attempts to reduce muscle activation levels or movement excursions to minimize metabolic- or movement-related costs. While kinematic feedback could reduce one's tendency to minimize effort during training, this has not been verified experimentally. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does functional resistance training during walking lead to motor slacking, and can techniques such as visual feedback be used to reduce these effects? METHODS: Fourteen able-bodied individuals participated in this experiment. Participants were trained by walking on a treadmill while a bidirectional resistance was applied to the knee using a robotic knee exoskeleton. During training, participants were either instructed to walk in a manner that felt natural or were provided real-time visual feedback of their kinematics. Electromyography and knee kinematics were measured to determine if adding resistance to the limb induced slacking and if feedback could reduce slacking behavior. Kinematic aftereffects were measured after training bouts to gauge adaptation. RESULTS: Functional resistance training without feedback significantly reduced knee flexion when compared to baseline walking, indicating that participants were slacking. This reduction in knee flexion did not improve with continued training. Providing visual feedback of knee joint kinematics during training significantly increased knee muscle activation and kinematic aftereffects. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings indicate that individuals are susceptible to motor slacking during functional resistance training, which could affect outcomes of this training. However, motor slacking can be reduced if training is provided in conjunction with a feedback paradigm. This finding underscores the importance of using additional methods that externally motivate motor adaptation when the body is not intrinsically motivated to do so.