Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects

不同非甾体抗炎药剂型和剂量下环氧合酶抑制谱的比较评价:对疗效和不良反应的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain disorders and exert pharmacological effects by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX). Although previous studies have evaluated the COX inhibitory activity and selectivity of NSAIDs, none has compared COX inhibitory concentrations with the plasma concentrations of clinical doses or investigated the efficacy and adverse effects of different dosage forms. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the COX inhibitory activities and inhibition rates of clinical doses of the various NSAID formulations, especially diclofenac sodium. METHODS: Human blood and the drug (diclofenac sodium, celecoxib, ibuprofen, flurbiprofen, or etodolac) were mixed and incubated, and the supernatant was collected and quantified the COX inhibitory activity of each drug by ELISA. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the inhibition rates at maximum plasma drug concentration (C(max)) of clinical doses of marketed formulations. For diclofenac sodium, we also calculated the concentrations at which COX inhibition rates were 50% and 80% (IC(50) and IC(80)). RESULTS: COX-2 inhibition rate at C(max) of clinical doses exceeded 50% except celecoxib 100 mg. For diclofenac sodium, the C(max) at the clinical doses of the oral and suppository formulations showed almost complete inhibition of COX-2 and an inhibition rate exceeding IC(80) for COX-1. The C(max) at repeated doses of the transdermal formulation showed an inhibition rate above IC(80) for COX-2 but below IC(80) for COX-1. DISCUSSION: This result explains why gastrointestinal disorders frequently occur with oral and suppository formulations of diclofenac sodium despite its relatively high COX-2 selectivity. Although the plasma drug concentration of the transdermal formulation is lower than oral and suppository formulations, it has an inhibition rate above IC(50) for COX-2, which is required for analgesic efficacy, and has a lower COX-1 inhibition rate than these formulations. CONCLUSION: The findings explain why the transdermal formulation exerts an analgesic effect despite having a lower C(max) than other diclofenac sodium formulations.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。