Microbiome differences between trauma- and caries-derived periapical lesions using next-generation sequencing

利用新一代测序技术分析创伤和龋齿引起的根尖周病变微生物组差异

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While the microbiome of caries-derived periapical lesions has been extensively characterized, the microbial profile of trauma-derived periapical lesions remains poorly understood. This study aimed to characterize the apical microbiome of trauma-derived periapical lesions and identify taxonomic differences between trauma- and caries-derived periapical lesions. METHODS: Twenty patients with periapical lesions were enrolled, comprising 10 trauma-derived cases (trauma group) and 10 caries-derived cases (caries group). Microbial samples were collected using sterile paper points inserted into the root canal exudate, followed by DNA extraction and Illumina sequencing of the hypervariable V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Bioinformatic analyses included α-diversity, β-diversity based on Bray-Curtis distance and differential abundance testing (LEfSe method with LDA score ≥ 2.0). RESULTS: Sequencing revealed 36 bacterial phyla and 587 genera across all samples. Trauma group showed significantly greater relative abundance of Campylobacter (P = 0.002) compared to caries group, whereas Prevotella (P = 0.008), Vibrio (P = 0.041) and Filifactor (P = 0.006) exhibited reduced abundance. The core microbiota in the trauma group included Phocaeicola, Porphyromonas and Pyramidobacter, based on relative abundance. LEfSe analysis identified Campylobacter as a biomarker for the trauma group. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma-derived periapical lesions exhibited reduced microbial diversity compared to caries-derived periapical lesions, with Campylobacter identified as a potential pathognomonic taxon for trauma-derived periapical lesions.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。