Clinical experience with cryopreserved mesenchymal stem cells for cardiovascular applications: A systematic review

冷冻保存间充质干细胞在心血管应用中的临床经验:系统评价

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As living biodrugs, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have progressed to phase 3 clinical trials for cardiovascular applications. However, their limited immediate availability hampers their routine clinical use. AIM: To validate our hypothesis that cryopreserved MSCs ((Cryo)MSCs) are as safe and effective as freshly cultured MSC counterparts but carry logistical advantages. METHODS: Four databases were systematically reviewed for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the safety and efficacy of (Cryo)MSCs from various tissue sources in treating patients with heart disease. A subgroup analysis was performed based on MSC source and post-thaw cell viability to determine treatment effects across different (Cryo)MSCs sources and viability status. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios were calculated to measure changes in the estimated treatment effects. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan version 5.4.1 software. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (285 patients) met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. During short-term follow-up, (Cryo)MSCs demonstrated a significant 2.11% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [WMD (95%CI) = 2.11 (0.66-3.56), P = 0.004, I (2) = 1%], with umbilical cord-derived MSCs being the most effective cell type. However, the significant effect on LVEF was not sustained over the 12 months of follow-up. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a substantial 3.44% improvement in LVEF [WMD (95%CI) = 3.44 (1.46-5.43), P = 0.0007, I (2) = 0%] when using MSCs with post-thaw viability exceeding 80%. There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of major cardiac adverse events observed in rehospitalization or mortality in patients treated with (Cryo)MSCs vs the control group. CONCLUSION: (Cryo)MSCs are a promising option for heart failure patients, particularly considering the current treatment options for cardiovascular diseases. Our data suggest that (Cryo)MSCs could be a viable alternative or complementary treatment to the current options, potentially improving patient outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。