Abstract
BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a leading cause of arthritis-related morbidity. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), as living biopharmaceuticals, have emerged as a potential treatment option due to their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy of allogenic MSCs ((Allo)MSCs) vs autologous MSCs ((Auto)MSCs) in treating KOA in clinical settings. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of (Allo)MSCs vs (Auto)MSCs in treating KOA. Our systematic search of four databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, identified relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting MSC-based treatment for KOA and reporting visual analog scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis scores, and adverse events. We assessed the methodological quality of the studies using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and calculated risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences [with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)]. Our statistical analyses used the R-Studio network meta-packages (version 2023.12.0). The study protocol was pre-registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42024590866). RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs involving 1216 patients with KOA met the inclusion criteria of the study. The network meta-analysis showed that (Allo)MSCs gave a significant reduction in visual analog scale scores by 14.91 points (95%CI: -24.52 to -5.30) vs 12.95 points with (Auto)MSCs (95%CI: -24.42 to -1.48). For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis score, (Allo)MSCs led to a significant reduction of 23.12 points (95%CI: -31.15 to -15.10) compared with 12.45 points using (Auto)MSCs (95%CI: -19.31 to -5.59), thus revealing a significant improvement with (Allo)MSCs (weighted mean difference: -10.62, 95%CI: -21.23 to -0.11). Additionally, (Auto)MSCs treatment showed a higher risk of joint-related adverse events (RR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.07-1.79) compared with (Allo)MSCs (RR = 1.13, 95%CI: 1.01-1.25). CONCLUSION: (Allo)MSCs may offer superior clinical outcomes with a lower risk of adverse events compared with (Auto)MSCs in the treatment of KOA. However, the need for further RCTs directly comparing the two MSC types is crucial to validate this data, underscoring the importance of our findings in this field.