The inconclusive superiority debate of allogeneic versus autologous MSCs in treating patients with HFrEF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

异体间充质干细胞与自体间充质干细胞治疗HFrEF患者疗效孰优孰劣之争尚无定论:一项RCT的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized controlled trials have consistently demonstrated the safety and potential efficacy of MSC therapy for heart failure patients. This study delves into mesenchymal stem cells' promising potential, offering a beacon of hope for the future of heart failure treatment with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for this systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched four databases and registers for RCTs, including PubMed, EBSCO, clinicaltrials.gov, ICTRP, and other relevant websites. We then selected thirteen RCTs with 1184 participants based on our pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two independent assessors extracted the data and performed a quality assessment. The data were then plotted for various outcomes, including death, hospitalization, major adverse cardiac events, pump function parameters, and 6-min walk distance. RESULTS: The safety of MSC-based treatment has been consistently demonstrated with MSCs from autologous ((Auto)MSCs) and allogeneic ((Allo)MSCs) sources. This reassuring finding underscores the reliability of MSC-based therapy irrespective of their source. However, (Auto)MSCs showed a trend toward greater protective benefits. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences between (Auto)MSCs and (Allo)MSCs in improving LVEF; 0.86% (95% CI - 1.21-2.94%) for (Allo)MSCs versus 2.17% (- 0.48%; 95% CI - 1.33-5.67%) for (Auto)MSCs. (Allo)MSCs significantly reduced end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) by - 2.08 mL (95% CI - 3.52-0.64 mL). Only (Allo)MSCs significantly improved 6-min walking distance (6-MWD); 31.88 m (95% CI 5.03-58.74 m) for (Allo)MSCs versus 31.71 m (95% CI - 8.91-71.25 m) for (Auto)MSCs. The exclusion of studies using adipose-derived cells resulted in even better safety and a significant improvement in LVEF for (Allo)MSCs treatment. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that (Allo)MSCs are at par with (Auto)MSCs in improving functional outcomes in heart failure patients. This underscores the need for future investigations in a larger patient cohort, emphasizing the urgency and importance of further research to fully understand the potential of MSCs in treating heart failure.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。