Discrepancies between conventional and viscoelastic assays in identifying trauma-induced coagulopathy

传统检测方法与粘弹性检测方法在识别创伤性凝血病方面存在差异

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trauma-induced coagulopathy can present as abnormalities in a conventional or viscoelastic coagulation assay or both. We hypothesized that patients with discordant coagulopathies reflect different clinical phenotypes. METHODS: Blood samples were collected prospectively from critically injured patients upon arrival at two urban Level I trauma centers. International normalized ratio (INR), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), thromboelastography (TEG), and coagulation factors were assayed. RESULTS: 278 patients (median ISS 17, mortality 26%) were coagulopathic: 20% with isolated abnormal INR and/or PTT (CONVENTIONAL), 49% with isolated abnormal TEG (VISCOELASTIC), and 31% with abnormal INR/PTT and TEG (BOTH). Compared with VISCOELASTIC, CONVENTIONAL and BOTH had higher ISS, lower GCS, larger base deficit, and decreased factor activities (all p < 0.017). They received more blood products and had more ICU/ventilation days (all p < 0.017). Mortality was higher in CONVENTIONAL (40%) and BOTH (49%) than VISCOELASTIC (6%, p < 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Although TEG-guided resuscitation improves survival after injury, INR and PTT identify coagulopathic patients with highest mortality regardless of TEG and likely represent distinct mechanisms independent of biochemical clot strength.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。