Abstract
BACKGROUND: Even though the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, alirocumab and evolocumab, have been approved to reduce plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in high-risk patients, real-world data showing comparisons of the lipid-lowering effects between alirocumab and evolocumab are scarce because of the low prescription rates of PCSK9 inhibitors in clinical practice. METHODS: Between Feb 2018 and Sep 2021, 22 patients who received alirocumab and 22 patients who received evolocumab at a tertiary medical center were enrolled. The patients' baseline characteristics, prescribed medications, plasma LDL-C levels, and percentages of reduction in LDL-C were compared between alirocumab users and evolocumab users. RESULTS: The alirocumab users more frequently received ezetimibe treatment (72.7% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.03) and had higher baseline LDL-C (165.6 ± 63.2 mg/dL vs. 130.8 ± 56.3 mg/dL, p = 0.04) compared with the evolocumab users. At 6 months of follow-up, the plasma LDL-C levels in the alirocumab users were similar to those in the evolocumab users (79.3 ± 64.0 mg/dL vs. 63.5 ± 44.1 mg/dL, p = 0.48). Additionally, the percentages of LDL-C reduction following treatment were similar between the alirocumab users and evolocumab users (-47.0% ± 45.0% vs. -49.8 ± 24.9%, p = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: The LDL-C lowering effects of alirocumab are similar to those of evolocumab in clinical practice.