Abstract
PURPOSE: Since its introduction in the 1950s, the microsurgical paradigm has revolutionized neurosurgery. New technologies have been introduced over the years trying to overcome limits of the classical operating microscope. The recently developed 3D exoscopes represent a potential new paradigm for micro-neurosurgery. We analyzed our own experience with a 4 K-3D exoscope in a series of pediatric brain tumors to verify its advantages and limitations in comparison to the operating microscope and in light of the literature. METHODS: Twenty-five pediatric patients with brain tumors underwent surgery at our Institute; the population has been analyzed and described. A score to evaluate the exoscopes and compare it to the operating microscope was considered and postoperatively applied to each single case. RESULTS: The exoscope appears to be at least comparable to the operating microscope (OM) in all analyzed aspects. In the case of deep-seated or fourth ventricle tumors, the exoscope seems to be superior to the microscope. A surgeon-dependent learning curve is necessary for neurosurgeons to be confident with the exoscope. CONCLUSION: Exoscopes appear to be as safe and effective as operating microscopes in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery. They have some advantages that make them superior to microscopes, particularly regarding surgeon ergonomics and fatigue, visual field qualities, and higher choice of intraoperative viewing angles.