Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) categories I, III, and V account for a significant proportion of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) diagnoses. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of BRAF (V600E) mutation and the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) classification in differentiating papillary thyroid cancers (PTCs) from benign lesions among BSRTC I, III, and V nodules. METHODS: A total of 472 patients with 479 nodules were enrolled in this prospective study. Ultrasound, BRAF (V600E) mutation testing, and FNAC were performed in each nodule, followed by surgery or regular ultrasound examination. RESULTS: In the BSRTC I category, BRAF (V600E) showed similar sensitivity, higher specificity, and lower accuracy when compared with TIRADS. In the BSRTC III/V category, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of BRAF (V600E) were similar to those of TIRADS. In comparison to BRAF (V600E) alone, the combination of the two methods significantly improved sensitivity (BSRTC I: 93.6% vs. 67.7%, P < 0.01; BSRTC III: 93.8% vs. 75.0%, P < 0.01; BSRTC V: 96.0% vs. 85.3%, P < 0.001). When compared with TIRADS alone, the combination improved sensitivity in BSRTC I nodules (93.6% vs. 74.2%, P < 0.05), increased sensitivity and decreased accuracy in BSRTC III nodules (93.8% vs. 75.0%, P < 0.01, 91.0% vs. 93.6%, P < 0.01), and improved both sensitivity and accuracy in BSRTC V nodules (96.0% vs. 82.0%, P < 0.001; 94.2% vs. 81.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BRAF (V600E) exhibited higher specificity and lower accuracy compared with TIRADS in BSRTC I nodules, while the two methods showed similar diagnostic value in BSRTC III/V nodules. The combination of the two methods distinctly improved sensitivity in the diagnosis of PTCs in BSRTC I, III, and V nodules.