Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Mobility impairments constitute a long-term burden in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Currently there is evidence that the drug fampridine may improve nonwalking symptoms in MS patients. The main objective of this study is to analyze whether participants showing a beneficial walking response to fampridine, also show a positive response in nonwalking assessments in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: Subjects enrolled were part of a study analyzing gait parameters, for which response to treatment with fampridine was monitored after a period of 2 weeks. Neurologists then decided whether patients were responders to fampridine (RF) according to their global impression of patients' gait improvement. As nonwalking outcomes, we included the nine-hole peg test (9-HPT), the EuroQoL five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) for quality of life, The Würzburger Fatigue Inventory for MS (WEIMuS), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies depression scale (CES-D), and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was evaluated for each test. RESULTS: A total of 189 participants were included: 122 were women (64.55%), with a mean age of 53.55 (±10.83). RFs showed significant improvement in all of the nonwalking outcomes (p < 0.05), except for a nonsignificant improvement in nondominant upper limb function and PASAT; the largest score improvement was seen in the physical and cognitive sections of the WEIMuS (25.69% and 29.81%, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We provide evidence that physician's global judgement of walking improvement is a reliable measure for determining response to fampridine in nonwalking parameters, with fatigue showing the greatest score improvement after 2 weeks.