Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for intracranial aneurysm of the anterior cerebral circulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

颅内动脉瘤前循环颅内动脉瘤的颅外-颅内搭桥手术:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety of extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass in the management of anterior circulation intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remains to be determined. This systematic review aims to summarize the existing evidence and provide guidance for the precise management of IAs. DATA SOURCE: We constructed search strategies and comprehensively searched Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane library. METHODS: This systematic review was actualized according to the PRISMA statement. We evaluated study quality using the methodological index for non-randomized study (MINORS). Effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the I (2) test. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger's test. The registration number for this systematic review is CRD42023396730. RESULT: This systematic review included a total of 21 articles, involving 915 patients. Postoperative bypass patency rate was 99% (95% CI 0.98-1.00); short-term follow-up was 98% (95% CI 0.94-1.00); long-term follow-up was 95% (95% CI 0.93-0.97). The long-term follow-up occlusion rate of saphenous vein was higher than that of radial artery (OR 6.10 95% CI 1.04-35.59). Short-term surgery-related mortality was 0.3% (95% CI 0.000-0.012); long-term follow-up was 0.4% (95% CI 0.000-0.013); The proportion of patients with a score of 0-2 on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) during long-term follow-up was 92% (95% CI 0.86-0.98). The incidence rates of long-term follow-up complications were: ischemic 3% (95% CI 0.01-0.06); hemorrhagic 1% (95% CI 0.00-0.03); neurological deficit 1% (95% CI 0.00-0.03); other 3% (95% CI 0.01-0.06). LIMITATION: Most of the included studies were retrospective studies. Studies reporting preoperative status were not sufficient to demonstrate postoperative improvement. Lack of sufficient subgroup information such as aneurysm rupture status. CONCLUSION: EC-IC therapy for anterior circulation IAs has a high safety profile. Higher level of evidence is still needed to support clinical decision. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023396730, identifier: CRD42023396730.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。