Abstract
PURPOSE: We compared the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (S-RALP) using the da Vinci SP® system and conventional multi-port robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (M-RALP) in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-port and single-port pyeloplasty have been performed in pediatric patients in our institution since October 2015 and February 2019, respectively. We conducted an entire cohort comparison. Considering the learning curve of M-RALP, we defined the last 15 cases of M-RALP as a subgroup of M-RALP and compared this subgroup with the entire cohort of S-RALP patients. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients who underwent multi-port pyeloplasty and 15 patients who underwent single-port pyeloplasty were enrolled in this study. Age, height, body weight, laterality, surgical indication, and ipsilateral differential renal function were statistically similar in the M-RALP and S-RALP groups. The median operative time (3.0 h vs. 2.4 h; p=0.01) and the median console time (2.2 h vs. 1.5 h; p<0.001) were longer in the M-RALP group than in the S-RALP group. There was no significant difference in operative time or console time between the M-RALP subgroup and the S-RALP group. There were no significant differences in the length of hospitalization, pain score, morphine-equivalent use of analgesics, or postoperative differential renal function in all comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that pyeloplasty using the da Vinci® SP system can be started by robotic surgeons who can overcome the learning curve. Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-port pyeloplasty is feasible in noninfant pediatric patients.