Abstract
CONTEXT: Insulin sensitivity and secretion indices can be useful tools in understanding insulin homeostasis in children at risk for diabetes. There have been few studies examining the reproducibility of these measures in pediatrics. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether fasting or oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived insulin measures would be more reproducible and whether there would be differences based on weight, sex, race, and pubertal status. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Clinical research unit. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-seven overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 85th%, n = 186) and normal weight (BMI < 85th%, n = 71) children without diabetes between ages of 8 and 17 were included in the study. METHODS: OGTT tests performed in study participants at two separate visits within a 3-week period. We performed two formal oral glucose tolerance tests within a 3-week period. The reproducibility of fasting measures was compared with OGTT-derived measures by weight categories and compared by weight, sex, race, and pubertal status. Comparisons were made between the correlation coefficients of fasting vs. OGTT-derived measures and between normal weight vs. obese/overweight participants, male vs. female, White vs. Black, and pre- vs. post-midpubertal. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for each comparison as well. RESULTS: For insulin sensitivity, the OGTT-derived measure was more reproducible than the fasting measures. There were no significant differences in reproducibility in the overweight/obese population compared to the normal weight population nor by sex, race, or pubertal status. CONCLUSIONS: Nonfasting insulin sensitivity measures are more reproducible than fasting insulin sensitivity measures, regardless of weight category. Insulin secretion measures have poor reproducibility overall. Weight status, sex, race, and midpubertal stage do not impact the reproducibility of insulin sensitivity and secretion measures.