Real-world evaluation of the accuracy of the Viz.AI automated intracranial hemorrhage volume calculation tool

Viz.AI 自动化颅内出血体积计算工具准确性的实际应用评估

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appropriate management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) requires rapid, accurate volume estimation. Viz.AI has developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered ICH calculation tool that may improve existing methods. METHODS: Adult patients presenting to a large healthcare system between December 2015 and December 2021 with spontaneous ICH greater than 10mL and within 72 hours since ictus were analyzed for hematoma volume. mABC/2 (modified ABC/2) was measured by a board-certified neurosurgeon. Semi-autonomous segmentation (SAS) was performed by a trained medical student on 3D Slicer, adjudicated by a board-certified neurosurgeon and used as a surrogate ground-truth volume. RESULTS: 139 CTs met inclusion criteria. Mean ICH volume via ground-truth SAS was 47.69±27.19 mL. Mean ICH volume difference between SAS and AI and SAS and mABC/2 was 4.77±4.06 mL and 8.36±9.48 mL, respectively (p<0.01). Bland-Altman plots yielded AI and SAS limits of agreement between -4.45 and 13.18 mL, and mABC/2 and SAS limits of agreement between -21.35 and 27.02 mL. The average absolute difference between IVH volume yielded by SAS and AI was 3.26±3.55 mL. Bland-Altman plots yielded IVH volume limits of agreement between -7.48 mLand 10.47 mL. AI was 94.6% sensitive and 94.0% specific for detecting IVH in the presence of ICH. The average time-to-volume for SAS and AI was 424±208 and 151±49.7 s (P<0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: Viz.AI is more accurate than mABC/2, and more rapid than SAS. The combination of speed and accuracy makes Viz.AI viable for clinical decision-making and clinical trial use.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。