Advantage of bedside versus conventional operating room surgery in the management of term and preterm newborn infants: a single center retrospective observational study

床旁手术与传统手术室手术在足月和早产新生儿治疗中的优势:一项单中心回顾性观察研究

阅读:2

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare postoperative outcomes of bedside surgery (BS) with those of surgery performed in the operating room (ORS) in preterm and full-term neonates. METHODS: Data from neonates undergoing major surgical interventions were retrospectively evaluated. Primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative hypothermia. Secondary outcomes were the mortality rate within 30 days of surgery and the occurrence of post-operative infection within 48 h of surgery. RESULTS: 374 interventions performed on 222 neonates were analysed: 55 interventions on 47 neonates in the BS group and 319 interventions on 175 neonates in the ORS group. Compared to the ORS group, infants in the BS group had lower gestational age (GA) and birthweight, higher incidence of morbidity and mortality at discharge. No difference was found in the incidence of postoperative hypothermia and infections within 48 h of surgery, while mortality within 30 days of surgery was higher in the BS group. To multivariable logistic regression analysis, weight at the time of surgery [OR (IC 95%) 0.711 (0.542-0.931); p 0.013] and emergency/urgency modality [OR (IC 95%) 1.934 (1.221-3.063); p 0.005] were identified as variables associated with the risk of hypothermia, while GA [OR (IC 95%) 0.830 (0.749-0.920); p 0.000] and need for pre-surgery inotropes [OR (IC 95%) 8.221 (2.128-31.760); p 0.002] were associated with mortality within 30 days of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: BS resulted safe and effective in not increasing the risk of postoperative adverse events despite being performed in worse clinical conditions than ORS.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。