Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of incidental gallbladder cancer is low when performing cholecystectomy for benign disease. The performance of routine or selective histological examination of the gallbladder is still a subject for discussion. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of these different approaches. METHODS: Four management strategies were evaluated using decision-analytical modelling: no histology, current selective histology as practised in Sweden, macroscopic selective histology, and routine histology. Healthcare costs and life-years were estimated for a lifetime perspective and combined into incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to assess the additional cost of achieving an additional life-year for each management strategy. RESULTS: In the analysis of the four strategies, current selective histology was ruled out due to a higher ICER compared with macroscopic selective histology, which showed better health outcomes (extended dominance). Comparison of routine histology with macroscopic selective histology resulted in a gain of 12 life-years and an incremental healthcare cost of approximately €1 000 000 in a cohort of 10 000 patients, yielding an estimated ICER of €76 508. When comparing a macroscopic selective strategy with no histological assessment, 50 life-years would be saved and the ICER was estimated to be €20 708 in a cohort of 10 000 patients undergoing cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION: A macroscopic selective strategy appears to be the most cost-effective approach.