Abstract
Latest statements from European and American societies recommend to rule out viral presence in endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis before starting immunosuppression or immunomodulation in acute lymphocytic myocarditis presenting with life-threatening scenarios. However, recommendations in myocarditis are mostly based on heterogeneous studies enrolling patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathies and established heart failure rather than acute myocarditis. Thus, definitive evidence of a survival benefit from immunomodulation guided by viral presence is currently lacking. Finally, distinguishing innocent bystanders from causative agents among EMB-detected viruses remain challenging and a major goal to achieve in the near future. Therefore, considerable divergence remains between official recommendations and clinical practice, including the possibility of starting immunosuppressive therapy empirically, without knowing viral PCR results. This review systematically discusses the unsolved issues of immunomodulation guided by viral presence in acute lymphocytic myocarditis, namely (i) virus epidemiology and prognosis, (ii) variability of viral presence rates, (iii) the role of potential viral bystander findings, and (iv) the main results of immunosuppression controlled trials in lymphocytic myocarditis. Furthermore, a practical approach for the critical use of viral presence analysis in guiding immunomodulation is provided, highlighting its importance before starting immunosuppression or immunomodulation. Future, multicentre studies are needed to address specific scenarios such as fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis and a virus-tailored management as for parvovirus B19.