Physiological dead space and arterial carbon dioxide contributions to exercise ventilatory inefficiency in patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction heart failure

生理无效腔和动脉二氧化碳对射血分数降低或保留的心力衰竭患者运动通气效率低下的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

AIMS: Patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced (HFrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction demonstrate an increased ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (V̇(E) /V̇CO(2) ) slope. The physiological correlates of the V̇(E) /V̇CO(2) slope remain unclear in the two HF phenotypes. We hypothesized that changes in the physiological dead space to tidal volume ratio (V(D) /V(T) ) and arterial CO(2) tension (PaCO(2) ) differentially contribute to the V̇(E) /V̇CO(2) slope in HFrEF vs. HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Adults with HFrEF (n = 32) and HFpEF (n = 27) [mean ± standard deviation (SD) left ventricular ejection fraction: 22 ± 7% and 61 ± 9%, respectively; mean ± SD body mass index: 28 ± 4 kg/m(2) and 33 ± 6 kg/m(2) , respectively; P < 0.01] performed cardiopulmonary exercise testing with breath-by-breath ventilation and gas exchange measurements. PaCO(2) was measured via radial arterial catheterization. We calculated the V̇(E) /V̇CO(2) slope via linear regression, and V(D) /V(T) = 1 - [(863 × V̇CO(2) )/(V̇(E)  × PaCO(2) )]. Resting V(D) /V(T) (0.48 ± 0.08 vs. 0.41 ± 0.11; P = 0.04), but not PaCO(2) (38 ± 5 mmHg vs. 40 ± 3 mmHg; P = 0.21) differed between HFrEF and HFpEF. Peak exercise V(D) /V(T) (0.39 ± 0.08 vs. 0.32 ± 0.12; P = 0.02) and PaCO(2) (33 ± 6 mmHg vs. 38 ± 4 mmHg; P < 0.01) differed between HFrEF and HFpEF. The V̇(E) /V̇CO(2) slope was higher in HFrEF compared with HFpEF (44 ± 11 vs. 35 ± 8; P < 0.01). Variance associated with the V̇(E) /V̇CO(2) slope in HFrEF and HFpEF was explained by peak exercise V(D) /V(T) (R(2)  = 0.30 and R(2)  = 0.50, respectively) and PaCO(2) (R(2)  = 0.64 and R(2) = 0.28, respectively), but the relative contributions of each differed (all P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Relationships between the V̇(E) /V̇CO(2) slope and both V(D) /V(T) and PaCO(2) are robust, but differ between HFpEF and HFrEF. Increasing V̇(E) /V̇CO(2) slope appears to be strongly explained by mechanisms influential in regulating PaCO(2) in HFrEF, which contrasts with the strong role of increased V(D) /V(T) in HFpEF.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。